Talk:Fremont–Winema National Forest

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal[edit]

Support remerging component forests into administratively renamed forest. No need for three separate articles. Katr67 (talk) 04:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are they really one NF?[edit]

From what I've read they still sound like different NFs. I assumed they were administratively combined because the USFS is chronically underfunded and their way to cut back on a couple of ranger salaries was to put them under one jurisdiction. Further, this revised visitation estimate from the USFS lists them separately in 2006, while not listing other NFs that have been combined separately (like the Wallowa-Whitman). But then again I may be wrong - it's happened before...

If they ARE one single NF now, who's the genius that kept the name plural? Axcordion (talk) 05:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Government Bureaucracy. They are two (at least) forests organized under one official designation. For Wikipedia purposes I suppose they could be combined into one article with two sections as long as the links from Fremont Forest and Winema Forest led here. But as they were separate for most of their history they could stay separate also.(JoeTimko (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Bald Eagle no longer endangered[edit]

The page lists the Bald Eagle under the endangered species list, but according to the Bald Eagle reference page, it was taken off the endangered species list in 2007 - 5 years ago. I'm going to remove it here, too. Kenn (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fremont–Winema National Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6ENvCUJPk?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foresthistory.org%2FASPNET%2FPlaces%2FNational%2520Forests%2520of%2520the%2520U.S.pdf to http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/Places/National%20Forests%20of%20the%20U.S.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]