Talk:French ironclad Bouvines

French ironclad Bouvines has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 2, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Bouvines/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

1. Prose On hold

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Comments

1.

Is there a specific reason that the convention of having the subject of article in bold in the first sentence isn't done here?
- 'Cause I'm an idiot?
"The crew of the Bouvines class numbered 18 officers and 318 ratings; service as a flagship added 5 more officers and 33 more ratings.[2]" - This suggests 336 and 374, the infobox states 333 and 371
- Typo, fixed to 15 officers
"The Bouvines class had a full-length waterline armor belt of steel that tapered from the maximum thickness of 464 mm (18.3 in) amidships to 250 mm (9.8 in) at the ship's ends." - Infobox gives 434 for the top number.
"others, including Rear Admiral Chateauminois" - Is his full name known?
"briefly became the flagship of Rear Admiral Ménard" - Is full name known?
" was replaced by Rear Admiral Escande" - Ditto as above
- I've been unable to find their first names. None of them are listed in my biographical dictionary of French admirals.

2.

Referencing looks good.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Licensing looks good.

7.

Placing on hold, just a few things to tighten up.

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]