Talk:Fun and Fancy Free

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Giant Didn't Die

I don't have a copy of the movie for accurate reference, but shortly after the Mickey and The Beanstalk segment returned to Edgar Bergen and friends, Willie the Giant tore the roof off the house, asking for directions (or something). He then took the giant hat from the Brown Derby restaurant and walked away. Although the animated segment implied that Willie died from the fall, the live-action bookend softened the blow by showing he survived. Just1thing (talk) 17:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I own the movie on Blu-ray and while Willie wasn't asking for directions, he was asking if they had seen a "teensy, weensy, little mouse", meaning Mickey. So you are right, he did not die. The article has been fixed to clarify this. Also added is that the other version of the Mickey and the Beanstalk segment (with Ludwig Von Drake) still has mostly the same ending. I've seen that version too; it is on Netflix along with other Mickey Mouse cartoons. Kkjj (talk) 23:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly decent

>"The film was released on September 27, 1947 and enjoyed fairly decent reception.

Define "fairly decent," please. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you speaking to someone in particular? If you have a problem with promotional tone, which this unsourced summary of critical response presents, delete it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still trying to find sources for the reception, but it does have 75% on Rotten Tomatoes. The Rotten Tomatoes page has 8 reviews so far and 6 are fresh. Can we add more reviews? I need to know which are the most reliable. I honestly really enjoyed the movie, so I would have said higher than 75%. I would make it more like 92%. Meanwhile, the average rating from critics is a 6/10. I would have given it an 8/10 rating. No, I'm not saying they did. Anyway, which reviews should I mention? Kkjj (talk) 23:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If no one responds, I will try to WP:Be bold and add them myself. Note I will do the best I can on these. Kkjj (talk) 23:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I started it, but I need to know that what I wrote is exceptable. There are 6 more reviews I need to cover. Kkjj (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New book can be a major source

Film historian J.B. Kaufman has just released his new book dedicated to Fun and Fancy Free, titled The Making of Walt Disney's Fun and Fancy Free. This article can potentially benefit from the new research Kaufman has conducted for the book. LionFosset (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]