This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article meets all notability guidelines. Keller is one of the top saxophonists in the world, and has played with some of the same performers that qualify others under the notability standards. Further, it would be nice if y'all actually READ the bio in its entirety. It is fully documented, which is your other normal knee-jerk tag without reading. The page is fully cited and documented. If there is something you feel needs further documentation, please leave the SPECIFIC reference that you take umbrage with and I will make sure that I pull the source citation. Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theclevertwit (talk • contribs)
I am sure Keller is "notable" in the "real-world" and Keller may well be notable per Wikipedia guidelines, but this has not been established per the references. The first reference is a short bio about the individual. The second is his name on an artist roster, the third is interview (this is considered to be a primary reference - articles need to be supported by secondary references); the fourth is a magazine cover, the fifth is a list of his shows, and the last one is book review. Of these the first and the last are the one that have any substance, but they are not enough to support the article. I suggest you read WP:RS for advice on what constitutes a good reference. Oh, and please feel free to apologize for assuming I did not read the article in its entirety. My best to you. reddogsix (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
