This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
For some reason, the heirs apparent to the Earldom of Glasgow appear to have used the style of "Lord Boyle," rather than "Viscount Kelburn," until 1818. See [1], from James Balfour Paul's "The Scots peerage" (1907), which notes that John "was invariably styled Lord Boyle during his lifetime," while James "was styled Viscount Kelburne after the death of Lord Boyle, his brother, in 1818." Numerous primary sources are cited in JBP's work, so I feel it should stand, barring citations of contemporary evidence. Choess (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
