Talk:Gesellschaft zu Fraumünster

uncommented removal of the whole history section and categories, lead section

Hi @Dbachmann: by these three edits 15:19-15:20, 14 November 2017‎ you removed the whole history section at Gesellschaft zu Fraumünster, and categories without any comment or even disucussion at this talk. equally besides your removal of the whole history section, also the lead section, was rewritten in an evaluative way, focussing as feminist organization, but, conversely, you removed imho appropriate categories... Good intention assumed, please share your intention to do so, and to rewrite the lead section in an appropriate way, thx, Roland zh (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: concurrently, and besides Fraumünster, at Zunfthaus zur Meisen you also removed a whole section and the wikilink to Gesellschaft zu Fraumünster. As pointed to at the related section, [quotation start]"...In 1752, construction of a new guild house was begun, and the widows of two stonemasons caused a stir by submitting a lower bid than their male counterparts. The two women were given the contract..."[quotation end]. Hence, it's appropriate to point to Zürich's women history at the 'Guilds', in contemporary times represented by the Fraumünster women, Roland zh (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:2 concurrently, at Fraumünster Abbey, on 15:22, 14 November 2017‎, you also removed a short section including the sole wikilink to Gesellschaft zu Fraumünster, which is appropriate to point to Zürich's women history, and particularly, of the Fraumünster abbey itself, which in contemporary times is represented by the Fraumünster women, Roland zh (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]