Jump to content

Talk:Ghadr-110

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A hoax?

[edit]

A simple google search [1] shows that this is a hoax. Just look at all first 10 results and you'll find that the only source is [2] and all the others refer to wikipedia article. There are also some unreliable reports there. It seems it's hoax made by People's Mujahedin of Iran (designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, the European Union, Canada, and Iran)(note that National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) is formed by PMO(refer to PMO article)).

It seems that hoax shouldn't remain in Wikipedia. --Hossein.ir 19:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC) I modified the article to -at least- show the unreliable nature of the information --MQWM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.242.5.107 (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • These are well cited references. The first one is from Farsnews quoting it has 2000Km range. Then you claim it's a hoax by people's Mujahedin? From when Farsnews is agency of People's Mujahedin? user "hossein", what do you consider reliable? An official news agency has quoted this. Sarmadys 13:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax

[edit]

Multiple news stories are sufficient to believe that this is a real development. I've removed the note at the top, and combined three instances of the same ref in the ref name format. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 19:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ghadr translation

[edit]

Ghadr translates into English more accurately as 'to the extent' or 'range', for example to say 'in ghadr ke man mitonam' is to say more or less 'to the extent that I can' . Intensity does not really make sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.113.143 (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghadr-110. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]