Talk:Gizmodo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Blogging (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Blogging, an attempt to build better coverage of Blogging on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Rooster Teeth[edit]

can someone add a link to the podcasts page? i dont know how.

its page is here.http://roosterteeth.com/groups/profile.php?id=6123


Blatantly obvious Apply fanboyism[edit]

I think there should be a section regarding the common criticism that Gizmodo has gone from reputable tech site to being an Apple fanboy's wet dream. Just about every article on it for the past few years have been praising Apple endlessly and criticizing everyone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.91.139 (talk)

I'd agree, but unless there are verifiable sources you can't include it in the article. Plus, it'd be pretty difficult to represent it neutrally. --Topperfalkon (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

First Talk Page Post About Something![edit]

So we've added the #whitenoise section. It looks pretty nice. Feel free to edit anything wonderfully new in, as is your right. If anyone feels like getting rid of it, let us know here, perhaps we can talk. Four tildes now?

Sithishade (talk) 07:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Let's throw something in there about Bill. He seems like a cool guy that impacted the community like no one's business. - Totallynotbilliswear —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.251.54 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Controversy[edit]

Generally when a company has broken laws (as with the iPhone) and caused controversy and disruptions (as with the TVBGone thing), we call that controversy, not coverage. It would be biased to call it anything else. 174.112.18.193 (talk) 01:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gizmodo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)