Talk:Gliese 777

This article must be split

Why? Other extrasolar planets get a page treatment, as they should, they're planets. Planets are a pretty big something to relegate to a subsection of the star page. Granted, while information is scant on the subject of Gliese 777A b and Gliese 777A c, the two planets, one day there could be hoardes of information, think about how much we know about Mars that we didn't even know five years ago. The links above appear to be based on NASAs listings at PlanetQuest. If no one is opposed I will split the articles after ample discussion time, a few days should suffice. Post your ramblings and whether you support or oppose, going for consensus here. A mcmurray 06:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

There is something wrong with the formatting of the infobox)es). A lot of white space is showing up between the first and second sections of the artilcle. I am not sure how to alleviate this. IvoShandor 10:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was no consensus. MartinZ02 (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Gliese 777 b be merged into this article. The star itself is notable only for its planet, so it makes more sense to cover the two subject together. Reyk _YO! 07:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The only reason that most stars are noteable is because of their exoplanet(s). This is an unsatisfactory reason. Davidbuddy9 (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.