Talk:Go Betty Go

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Go Betty Go article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

This band is more than notable. They have a wiki entry on the Turkish, French and Russian sites as well. Please stop deleting or messing with this page for no apparent reason. Donmike10 (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are talking about. No one is doubting the notability of the band, only that there are a limited number of adequate secondary sources for the article. If the band is so notable there should be no issue providing a couple more - currently there appears to be only two of substance. Instead of accusing others of deleting or messing with the page for no apparent reason, you might want to ask what the issue is. My best to you. ttonyb (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony - this page was just recreated. It was deleted for no apparent reason a few days ago. That is what I am referring to and yes - notability is what the issue was.Donmike10 (talk) 00:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the deletion the other day I believe was, at least, the the 3rd time it was deleted since 2008 for the same reason/s. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony - I just added a bunch more references, raising the total from 18 to 29. I'm not sure what the normal minimum number of reference links is, but hopefully this is now sufficient. Please advise if more are still needed, and if so, please state what the normal number required is. Thanks. Robman94 (talk) 00:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of references here. No need to add any more. Donmike10 (talk) 18:11, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Go Betty Go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201120225/http://www.grammy.com/nominees to http://www.grammy.com/nominees

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Go Betty Go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128070816/http://skratchmagazine.com/interviews/interviews.php?id=84 to http://www.skratchmagazine.com/interviews/interviews.php?id=84

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]