Talk:God Is a DJ (Faithless song)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 May 19. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hi, I've removed the primary author's email address from the article. Please not that we generally do not sign articles. For more on this topic, please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. Your contributions are recoreded in the page history, as required by the GFDL.

I also removed his email address. Unless you want to throw that address away, it is not a good idea to post it anywhere on this site. In addition to Wikipedia being one of the 100 most visited websites in the world, many mirrors of Wikipedia exist, so you are in effect posting your email address on thousands of pages when you put it up here. I don't like spam so much, and don't think you would like the ammount that would come in if your email address stayed for very long.

Gentgeen 04:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No consensus God Is a DJ (Faithless song) → God Is a DJ — page was originally at God Is a DJ but was moved because Pink released a song of the same name 6 years later. The Faithless song has been much more successful and is better known. The page on the faithless song also contains a link to the pink song. Chappy84 12:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Weak Oppose - disambig pages should be used unless one is considerably better konwn than another, I think. -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Although Faithless' song was indeed (much) more successful, I think that the dab page is fine. Besides, if more "God is a DJ" songs are made, we won't have to deal with this again.--Hús ö nd 22:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Two-item dab pages are useless and should be avoided. Put the original and better-known article there with a toplink. -Anþony 20:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beardo 08:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are actually more hits for the pink song than the faithless one, although the numbers are quite similar. The way it is now is the best. Ultra-Loser ^{[ T ] [ C ]} 09:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Progressive Trance

I wouldn't really class this as prog trance!! 188.222.74.71 (talk) JJ72UK —Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on God Is a DJ (Faithless song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070907121756/http://www.faithlessweb.com:80/ to http://www.faithlessweb.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]