Talk:Godzillatron

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2013. The result of the discussion was merge to Darrell K Royal–Texas Memorial Stadium.

College football

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles

United States: Texas / University of Texas at Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Texas - University of Texas at Austin (assessed as Low-importance).

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• Darrell K Royal–Texas Memorial Stadium
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Darrell K Royal–Texas Memorial Stadium
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

Untitled

It is no longer known as Adzillatron. It was initially known as that during teh beginning but it is now more acceptable among the students. There is no question that it is a work in progress, but it no longer merits adzillatron.

Size?

Are we sure the new HD screen at Miami's Dolphin Stadium isn't as big as this, if not bigger... It's five less feet in height, but three feet wider.....—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spitwater (talk • contribs) 13:12, 2006 August 28 (UTC)

-It's questionable...

http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/28/godzillatron-goes-live-at-texas-royal-memorial-stadium/

http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/25/newest-worlds-largest-hdtv-at-tokyo-racetrack/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.221.246.100 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 2006 August 30 (UTC)

I have clarified the text to explain that either could be considered largest, depending upon definition. Johntex\^talk 05:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well since width is the greater dimension, any increase in height will yield a greater increase in area than an equivalent increase in width. Given that the ratio is not a 1:1 increase but a 5:3, there's no question that Godzillatron has the greater area.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Longhorn1022 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 2006 October 30

Yes, that is what I put in the article: "The Miami Dolphins have a high-definition screen with a larger diagonal measurement, but Godzillatron has greater square footage. [6]" - Johntex\^talk 01:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to last year

The screen is no longer split like it was for the first game. ohio state game had regular cameras, but they stretched the image. As of the iowa state game, there is HD video + replays avaliable on the godzillatron.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Corpx (talk • contribs) 17:57, 2006 September 26

Any idea why they had to use stretched standard-def TV for the Ohio State game? The game was being broadcast in HDTV. There was a report after the North Texas game that they were missing a part needed to show HD, but this was reported as false even before the Ohio State game.[1] So why wouldn't they have shown true high-definition for the Ohio State game since the cameras were clearly there? Johntex\^talk 17:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It will be interesting to see if they go back to a 4:3 aspect ratio this weekend since there won't be any HD cameras there, or if they will stretch the regular definition feed to fit the 16:9 aspect ratio. Johntex\^talk 17:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

there's the stadium crew and the tv crew. what's shown on the jumbotron is not the same TV feed. so, the HD cameras will be there for every home game. same at the erwin center. they earl miller productions crew produces both for stadium jumbotrons. Corpx 05:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would suspect it is the other way around. I doubt the stadium cameras are HD. Johntex\^talk 01:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you go by the northwest end of the stadium now, you'll see the HD production truck. Corpx 04:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this image. It shows the size of the current video screen. Corpx 17:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to the picture. I copyeditted the text to say that the initial use was similar in size to the old scoreboard (with the references provided) but that later games have featured 16:9 video centered in a frame of advertisement. Johntex\^talk 17:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname

I removed this statement from the article "(credit for the nickname goes to hornfans.com, a message board for University of Texas fans)." It strikes me as a vanity contribution on behalf of hornfans. There is no independent proof of who came up with the name, so this sort of informaiton should not be added unless a verifiable, reliable source can be found. I also restored the alternate name "Adzillatron" since this name is documented in the article with mutltiple sources. Johntex\^talk 01:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links in References

Should the links in the References section be removed if they are no longer to active pages? 76.21.8.213 (talk) 03:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimensions

There is much jabber about how this is the biggest screen in the Western hemisphere, but there is no mention of the actual dimensions. So, I ask, how big is this thing ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.165.113 (talk) 02:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]