Talk:Goodbye Pork Pie

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: New Zealand

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the New Zealand cinema task force.

"Stunts put Italian Job to shame"

I've just seen "Goodbye Pork Pie" (GPP) for the first time - and after reading the above comment in the article was moved to re-watch The Italian Job (TIJ - the original with Micheal Caine). Whilst GPP arguably has a better plot, more credible characters and so forth - it's stunts don't come close to being as good as those on TIJ. Both movies have Minis driving through buildings, doing handbrake turns, sliding through corners and such. The jump into the moving railway car in GPP is clearly easier than getting into the back of a moving bus up two steep and narrow ramps (especially in a front-wheel drive car). Aside from those direct comparisons, I don't see stunts that rival the jump from one building to the next, driving up the sides of sewer pipes, driving across a fast-flowing weir or over the roof of a football stadium. In both movies a police car ends up in a river - but the stunt in TIJ is much more complex and elegant.

Add to that the fact that each TIJ stunt had to be performed three times simultaneously or in quick succession by three different cars.

GPP is a great movie - but it doesn't touch TIJ for it's stunts.

Hence, I believe that (at best), the above comment is not NPOV and should be removed. At worst, it's flat out wrong - and demonstrably so.

SteveBaker 08:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fate of the Minis

The Trivia section states that "After the film two of the Minis that were undamaged were returned to The New Zealand Motor Corporation". However I know Geoff Murphy keep one of the undamaged ones and was still using it around 1981. I guess they could have been returned after that time or he come to some arrangement after return them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukoda (talk • contribs) 03:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"The film is really made by a series of non-CGI car chase sequences"

This is a bit like saying that the Titanic was a non-computerised passenger ship, or that the Roman Empire was a pre-space travel civilisation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.18.86 (talk) 11:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Goodbye Pork Pie Poster.jpg

Image:Goodbye Pork Pie Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"hanging out of her"? =

Is this NZ slang Wakelamp (talk) 01:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Specs

The article need some more tech specs. Was it filmed with video?, 35mm?, anamorphic?, etc. The DVD is 4:3, but that's maybe just an older production copy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.237.29 (talk) 11:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goodbye Pork Pie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090809224720/http://www.filmarchive.org.nz/archive_presents/1981/1981.html to http://www.filmarchive.org.nz/archive_presents/1981/1981.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Goodbye Pork Pie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]