Talk:Graham Fraser

Graham Fraser was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 9, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

untitled

Seems like a very long story about one incident is unbalanced for a biography page. Is it because it is about the Olympics and that is a current thing now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Significant one (talk • contribs) 22:45, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

→Yes. I'm planning on adding more events though, so it will end up being balanced.198.103.182.130 (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good article Nomination

Within the next few weeks, I will nominate this article for good article status. Emass100 (talk) 02:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Graham Fraser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AhmadLX (talk · contribs) 19:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 19:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig's. Although alot of reds are because of names of institutions or books, several sentences are copy-pasted or closely paraphrased, eg. Promotion of Linguistic Duality.The prize is given annually by the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages to an individual or organization in Canada that is not subject to the federal Official Languages Act, but that makes a difference by promoting linguistic duality in Canada or abroad, or by contributing to the development of official language minority communities. See other instances on the report page.
Not enough citations; many paras and claims are uncited: last sentence in "Early life and education", section "Jounalist", 1st para of "2010 Winter Olympics", and section "Family". Also "born", "residence", in infobox unreferenced.
Lead is completely inadequate. It should summarize all important aspects of the article.

Ref [2] redirects to website's homepage. No access date given, so it is unverifiable.
Ref [5] is unverifiable, no link is given. Same with ref [6], [7].
Source [19] and infobox say he was Commissioner of Official Languages, but the lead says he is.

At present, the article seems far from GA. The above issues are what I could see from a quick overview. I will fail it, under WP:GAFAIL, for now. When these issues [copyvio fixes, enough citations, lead rewrite, links & access dates for verifiability] are addressed, it can be renominated. Thanks. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 21:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]