Talk:Grand Pacific Junction

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grand Pacific Junction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Make sure to add a reference page at the bottom of your page. You can also add links to other Wikipedia articles. One can be added to the town in Ohio if it has one, Clint Williams, August, anything really. A picture could also be added. The first sentence should have more of a summary of what it is rather than where it is. The second sentence under “Grand Pacific Hotel” is not complete. A couple of lines after that, there is a p added to the word was. In the sentence “Some of the changes that were made was the removal…” change the word was to were. There seems to be a sort of bias, and admiration, try to eliminate te bias and just state facts. ---Lsbr234 (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Reviews Nice, well written page. You did a good job entailing the History section, as well as completing your infobox. Good job on including the dates of information and the backgroud history of the buildings. Some details that I would work on including would be adding links throughout the page, as well as a few pictures to allow readers to see what the buildings and places look like. I thought you did a good job on staying unbiased throughout your writing, as well as following the other Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnb 17 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The lead of your article establishes the topic's importance, so good job! This article is extremely well-written with good, reliable information. The history heading is the strongest heading on the page. Is it possible for you to add subheadings? This may help the page be more organized and concise, instead of having overbearing paragraphs. It's a webpage, so this approach may be more effective. Be sure to add a reference and external link (if applicable) heading. Your info box is brief and gives the appropriate amount of information, just remember to add a picture! There are a few run-on sentences, so be sure to fix this. You should check over the page for grammatical errors. A word is missing in the second sentence under the "Grand Pacific Hotel" heading. Also, I would add appropriate links to other Wikipedia pages as a reference. For example, if there is a Wikipedia page on Olmsted Falls, Ohio, I would link this to your page. The sections are organized in a sensible order, so good job! Also, you avoided using bias language, so this makes a strong article. This topic deserves to be on Wikipedia, as it follows all of the guidelines. Very good information! Akm138 (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]