Talk:GreenPAK
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit][1] is good. [2] and [3] appear to be more churnalistic. Other sources cited are not WP:RELIABLE. My own search turned up a few more middling sources such as [4]. Notability is marginal but this has waited long enough in the AfC queue. I'll accept and we'll see what happens. ~Kvng (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- There's some coverage in scholarly sources which make me think this is notable, although I suspect that the initial editor is likely paid. signed, Rosguill talk 22:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)