Talk:Green Alliance (Colombia)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge proposal
[edit]I oppose a merge. I think that these are two distinct parties, each worthy of an article. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
the green party is no longer called "center option" nor "option center". it's just colombian green party now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.66.2.2 (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Change should be made. I don't think anyone calls it center option anymore.--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 17:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- The main article should have the current name. I don't think that means anyone should remove references to the previous name and its history though. The text should clearly explain what happened previously, including what other names were used. Juancarlos2004 (talk) 22:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Article issues
[edit]A few issues:
- This article desperately needs to cite more sources. One source isn't enough given the amount of material in the article. It doesn't have to be internet sources, but it does need to be cited.
- This article needs to be made to sound more neutral. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
[edit]I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC)