Talk:Grierson Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Film festivals task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

The introduction states "The awards have grown in stature and recognition over the years and now are "more important (than ever). They have an impressive list engaging with a broad palette of styles and subjects from disabled people looking for love to asylums, Russian billionaires and global warming." [2]" - the reference is one comment by one author, and is hardly an objective statement. In fact, it reads like it was written by a public relations intern. For an introduction, it is especially important not to 'slip in' opinionated garbage - it reflects badly, and encourages the view that Wikipedia cannot be trusted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heenan73 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If something reads like "PR" and "opinionated garbage", then who would be trusting it?

In a case like that, you simply tag the article, calling for a rewrite.

Varlaam (talk) 22:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Who is Grierson"

Grierson is so fundamental to documentary film, is it actually necessary to "prove" that Grierson is Grierson in a minor article such as this?
Those facts should be taken as a given. Varlaam (talk) 22:51, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just say Geo. Washington was the first US president, or do I need to cite an 18th century newspaper article? Varlaam (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grierson Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]