Talk:Grundfos

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source

This article seems to be a direct summary of the company's own info page:

http://www.grundfos.com/web/grfosweb.nsf

I'll leave it to someone else to make the correct changes, as I dont think this is per wikipedia quality standard.

I agree with your comments above. Some parts are true but most is marketing rubbish at which Grundfos truly excel. I have made some changes based on insider knowledge but I can't quote 'facts' as not all is in the public domain. Offbeam (talk) 12:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Grundfos contains exclusively facts about Grundfos. Grundfos is constantly working on optimising all processes throughout the group. The thorough optimisation are serving both the customers and the business.

None of the comments made by "Offbeam" are factual - as he says himself. To maintain the high quality standard and credibility of Wikipedia, I suggest that such allegations are rejected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Constantinobel (talk • contribs) 09:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree with Constatinobel (who I suspect is Danish and biased)- I said the comments were not in the public domain - not they were not factual.

Grundfos have a large number of employees and supporters who believe the company can do no wrong - they will continue to edit this page to reflect corporate image rather than the truth. They would do well to read the ITT Lowara wiki entry which is more factual - and much more interesting than the Grundfos one currently which is largely corporate mumbo jumbo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Offbeam (talk • contribs) 20:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]