This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Well the subject clearly seems notable to me. I did not see a reason to reject it based on that. I also did searches to confirm. I agree the article should be cleaned up but I do not believe that is a reason to decline it. If I am wrong please let me know and show me the guideline. Jadeslair (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no poker guideline, just an unapproved essay. This means that WP:BIO applies, and I don't see enough sources cited to pass this bar. I did a search and also did not find anything beyond mentions on poker websites. Delta13C (talk) 17:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ok, I will take responsibility for it and try to cite notability items. If not then I will ask you how we should proceed as I do not know how to unapprove an article besides deletion. although I will research it Jadeslair (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is it, there are many articles but they say mostly the same things. I don't see a need to add one hundred similar citations. How would you like to proceed?Jadeslair (talk) 17:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
