Talk:Håga mound

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Norse history and culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have named it Kurgan, instead of mound or barrow as it is obviously in the same tradition as the other kurgans of the Bronze Age.--Wiglaf 10:09, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously? I would like a source for giving it the name kurgan, or even listing at as part of the same culture. Or is "obviously" just another word for user:Wiglaf's original research? /Pieter Kuiper 07:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kurgan is not a word associated with Scandinavian bronze age mounds, atleast not in scandinavia where the only word used for them is "hög" (mound). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.89.97.1 (talk) 13:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kurgan is a Turkic word associated with central Asian mounds. Just as mounds in the u.s. made by native americans are also not kurgans, it makes no sense to cal this one in sweden a kurgan. In english barrow seems reasonable. Whatever is used traditionally in archeological research would make the most sense. 69.0.52.111 (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly all other articles related to this topic are using the terms mound, barrow and tumuli, and there is no reason to associate these with Central Asia more than with the nearby ones in Europe. I propose reverting this to mound or barrow. 69.0.52.111 (talk) 19:49, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the page to Håga mound, I found that mound is an order of magnitude more common in the context of Uppland than barrow (~4 000 000 vs. ~ 400 000 hits in Google). MVH Macuser (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]