Talk:Hakan Taştan and Turan Topal
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Although the case against Hakan Taştan and Turan Topal is certainly of importance, I tend to believe that it does not deserve a separate page that could be considered the biography of living people. But it is rather written as an article in a newspaper and that is not what articles on living people should be (see the relevant link in the title).
Actually, the incident is covered in Freedom of religion in Turkey (with updated information) and could be mentioned on the page Article 301 (Turkish Penal Code). In that sense this article is not really needed and could be suggested for deletion. Sc.helm (talk) 14:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)