Talk:Harvard Business School
|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harvard Business School article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
This article is, to be blunt, crappy. I rated it a 'start'. For such an important article, it is filled with spam, vandalism, advertising, chicanery, and puffery, yet lacking essential citations. It really needs a cleanup. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- You're correct. Removed most of the SPS, copyvio promotional crap.Notabede (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Merger of Harvard Business X
I'd like to propose that Harvard Business X be merged into this article, Harvard Business School, because Harvard Business X has questionable notability and dodgy, advert-style content as a whole. It would fit nicely as a note in this article. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Harvard Business School
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Harvard Business School's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "auto":
- From Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania: "Wharton: From Boom to Bust to Boom". Wharton School. Retrieved 2014-01-03.
- From Boston: Bross, Tom; Harris, Patricia; Lyon, David (2008). Boston. London: Dorling Kindersley. p. 22.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)