Talk:Health advocacy

Invalid ISBN

Please do not use "ISBN 0000000000 (or any other temp. version of) on reference. We have a ISBN review team currently reviewing invalid ISBN's (Which this made up all ")'s) certainly is invalid) trying to prepare for a conversion from 10 digit to 13 digit ISBN. Ekotkie 20:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Author also

It looks like the person who wrote most of this article also posted it at her employer's website, without attribution. This consequently might appear, at first glance, to indicate a copyright violation, although I don't believe that it is. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal of October 2014 merge tags

It appears that someone tagged Patient advocacy and this page for merger without creating a discussion. As no one else has created such a discussion in the last 3-4 months, I'm removing the the merger tag templates from both pages as described in the last bullet item of the "General advice" found here. —Shelley V. Adams ‹blame
credit› 15:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

October 2017 partial split proposal

This article combines information about advocacy related to health policy with information about advocacy for individual patients without clearly or consistently distinguishing between the two. To reduce confusion and avoid redundancy, I propose splitting content about advocacy for individual patients from this article and merging it into Patient advocacy.

For discussion, see Talk:Patient advocacy § October 2017 partial merge proposal. —Shelley V. Adams ‹blame
credit› 17:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

• This article seems to have changed since October 2017, and also there clearly hasn't been consensus for further splitting. I've had a read of the article and think it is fairly ok at the moment, so I've boldly removed the split tag. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Health advocacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20061009193203/http://www.vnsny.org/mainsite/about/a_history.html to http://www.vnsny.org/mainsite/about/a_history.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006221541/http://www.childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10076&ClickedLink=0&area=3 to http://www.childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10076&ClickedLink=0&area=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)