Talk:Here Come the Mummies

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Uncanny Similarity?

How exactly is the similarity of the costumes worn by Here Come the Mummies and The Mummies 'uncanny?' They're mummies. There isn't really any kind of range of costumes one can wear when dressing as a mummy. It's pretty much one costume. You wrap yourself in gaze and unless you want the effect ruined you put on a little face paint. It's not uncanny, of course the two looks are going to be similar I would expect them to be darn near identical. The concept simply lends itself to one look. I've never seen or even heard of the punk band The Mummies and I would still be willing to bet money that their costumes pretty much look the same. Perhaps the writer doesn't understand the word uncanny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.166.23.62 (talk) 20:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were at least 3 various 'Mummies' groups in the rock'n'roll 50s. I've only seen one pictured but their costumes were uncannily similar to HCTM, did they use a time machine perchance? I'd be willing to bet that the other two groups also had similar costumes too, but here's the thing... Back between the wars there was an act called The Mummies who, from the description, I would guess were a kind of Wilson, Keppel, and Betty ('Betty' in this case being 'Cleopatra') and I would lay odds on their costumes also being uncannily similar to the aforementioned punk group. --Deke42 (talk) 00:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I love that there wikipedia link is completely bogus. That there references are all linked to nothing or what they planted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.74.50 (talk) 03:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On one of their performances on the Bob & Tom show included the song "Pants" from the album Single EntendrePika32141 (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Pika32141[reply]

3rd paragraph

The third paragraph makes no sense. It begins by suggesting that the live band is normally just the 5-piece rhythm section, then that it may also include a two piece brass section, then finally "sometimes" augmented by two more. Then it closes by stating "Typically the band plays with 9 members on stage."

Which is it? Normally 5 or typically 9? I'd correct it, but I don't know which is right...213.208.117.47 (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Several Edits

Made corrections to topics suggested above, created sections, verified a few bits and pieces with the band. CaptLola (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Here Come the Mummies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Major edits

I just made major edits to this article to bring it up to acceptable WP standards as far as possible with the existing material. This included deleting many dead or inappropriate citations, and adding Citations Needed flags to many as of now unsupported statements, as well as to section and the article as a whole. I suggest interested parties watching this page add valid citations quickly, or this article may be put up for deletion. RobP (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can see where there might be problems getting this particular group to conform to Wikipedia standards. The members are anonymous and all the information about them is invented (Unless it's all true, but I'm currently ruling that out). On the other hand, they do exist. I've seen them, but unfortunately that little titbit is also unallowable.

Incidentally, are they still performing? They don't seem to have toured or recorded in quite a while. Deke42 (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]