Talk:History of Sega/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 06:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- See my comments below.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- y
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Discussion
[edit]For criteria 2b and 2c, I'll look into detecting any copyvio problems, all dead citations must be archived or replaced and all live citations have archives in case they go dead. Other than that, there aren't any problems. Any thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Sjones23: You have a fair point on the lead; I'll look at expanding it today. Citations should all be archived; to be sure I ran the IAManagement Bot through it again and looked for missing items. Red Phoenix talk 11:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sjones23 As requested, I have expanded the lead. Red Phoenix talk 19:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Good work. If there's no further objections or concerns, I'll go ahead and pass it. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- No copyvio problems detected on my end. This article is now good to go. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sjones23 As requested, I have expanded the lead. Red Phoenix talk 19:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)