Talk:History of the Scottish National Party

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

55 Group - Did "leaflet" exist - Paragraph either need substantiated or removed[edit]

I have removed this clause from Early Years:

"... epitomised by the publication of a leaflet The English: Are They Human?"

Can anyone substantiate the existence of such a leaflet? Is a copy archived anywhere? Was the leaflet referred to in a newspaper report of the time. Where is the evidence for its existence? Has anyone ever heard of either this "55 Group" or of that leaflet? Please give as much detail as possible, so that that section of the article can be either improved or deleted.--Mais oui! 11:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard the phrase somewhere in passing before and it would likely come from a leaflet rather than a larger publication if it was in fact true. Can't definitely link it with the SNP though --Breadandcheese 06:48, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is referred to in SNP:The History of the Scottish National Party, by Peter Lynch, published in 2002. Big Jim Fae Scotland 10:35, 6 March 2006

No refs[edit]

Are there absolutely no references for any of the information on this page? 22. May 2007 69.91.130.156

Claims of Spying[edit]

I just added this section. If someone believes that this is not a NPOV claim, I would respond by saying that the activities taken by the labor government against the SNP have been well documented by major news sources, and historians as well. If further citations are needed (I understand that the claim might be controversial) I can provide additional citations from the work of Historians studying the SNP. I also need to work on this article in general and provide it with Citations. Ollie Garkey (talk) 10:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interference[edit]

Unless someone wants to come up with citations for any of the stuff in this paragraph i will remove it. NPOV, non notable conspiracy theorists moaning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.152.83.56 (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the Scottish National Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Scottish National Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140404202842/http://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/should-scotland-be-an-independent-country-1 to http://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/should-scotland-be-an-independent-country-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]