Talk:Holacanthus bermudensis

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aquarium Fishes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aquarium Fishes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Aquarium Fish articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Aquarium FishesWikipedia:WikiProject Aquarium FishesTemplate:WikiProject Aquarium FishesAquarium Fishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Endangered?

first of all, you do not have to tell about the conservation status in the main body. Simply look up the species at the IUCN (world conservation union) here [1]. then, in the taxbox (usually just after the image) make a line saying "| status = " after the = sign, write the abbreviation of the animal's status: LC-least concern, NT- near threatened, LR/cd- consevation dependent, VU- vulnerable, EN- endangered, CR- Criticly endangered , EW- extinct in the wild, EX- extinct (unless it is a fossil, then write "extinct (fossil" whrere the staus would be). Also, the text (missing a citation) list a population of 90. the IUCN does not include this angelfish in its list of thretened species ([2]) Therefore, once must infer that the status in "Least Concerm" I have a feeling that a population of 90 animals in the wild would certainly not be common for a "least Concern" animal. I'm going to add the IUCN staus for this species, but i still belive that this section should be deleted and if this fact is correct, it should have a reliable reference added and should be incorperedated into the rest of the passage. -let someone within wikiproject fished know if you have any questions Ryan shell (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I've been looking at the history of this artle, and it looks like the "90" regarding population is just vandalism by an IP adress with no other contributions. i'll restore the origonal number, but i still be live this section should be encorperated elseware. -cheers! Ryan shell (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of juvenile appreciated

Since the juvenile and adult forms of this species are so different, a photo a the former (as a secondary photo) could be useful to most readers.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bermuda blue angelfish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208181907/http://core.ecu.edu:80/biol/nortons/NCFishes/BonyFish/Pomacanthidae/BlueAngelfish/BlueAngelfish.html to http://core.ecu.edu/biol/nortons/NCFishes/BonyFish/Pomacanthidae/BlueAngelfish/BlueAngelfish.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

The version 11:46, 16 November 2022‎ Idoghor Melody of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing article.--Wing (talk) 06:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]