Talk:Honestly and Honestly (Encore)/GA1

CLOSED

Reviewer opened the page and hasn't edited on Wikipedia in the month since; closing per request of nominator conveyed at WT:GAN. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 05:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

@Wilhelmina Will: Any updates on this? Cartoon network freak (talk) Cartoon network freak (talk) 04:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close review?

@Zmbro: The reviewer hasn't been active for nearly a month now and never even started the review. Do you know how this review can be closed because it should as it is essentially useless? --Kyle Peake (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake Yeah the reviewer hasn't made any edits since picking this up so it should be closed. I'd ask an admin. – zmbro _(talk) 16:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.