Talk:Hope Logan
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hope Logan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130817051356/http://www.boldandbeautiful.com/index.cfm/pk/view/cd/NAA/cdid/465456/pid/465428 to http://www.boldandbeautiful.com/index.cfm/pk/view/cd/NAA/cdid/465456/pid/465428
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055612/http://boldandbeautiful.com/index.cfm/pk/view/cd/NAA/cdid/406142/pid/400035 to http://boldandbeautiful.com/index.cfm/pk/view/cd/NAA/cdid/406142/pid/400035
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hope's adoption
[edit]In these scenes (from May 20, 2004), Brooke and Nick discuss with Deacon the adoption of Hope. Deacon agreed for Nick to adopt Hope. And, in these scenes from May 24 of the same year, Nick discusses having adopted a daughter, Hope. So, via the scripts themselves, it was Nick (not Ridge) who adopted Hope as his daughter. Also, see Soapcentral.com's recap from the week of May 17, 2004, where they also recall Hope's adoption, via Nick, and the potential name-change to Hope Marone. The recap of the following week also makes mention of the adopted daughter, Hope. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Per this recap from the week of July 9, 2007, Deacon was not contacted by CPS, and the representative for CPS placed Hope and R. J. in Ridge's care, as she felt she had no other option than to do so, given Ridge's history. That is not Deacon signing over his parental rights to Ridge; that is CPS removing the children from Brooke's care and placing them into Ridge's. That is also not an adoption in the eyes of the law. And the only way for Nick to adopt Hope would be for Deacon to terminate his parental rights, which he did, which means in 2007, he had no legal claim to Hope. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)