Talk:House of Lords Reform Bill 2012

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on House of Lords Reform Bill 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111219211028/http://network.libdems.org.uk/manifesto2010/libdem_manifesto_2010.pdf to http://network.libdems.org.uk/manifesto2010/libdem_manifesto_2010.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528101556/http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/draft-house-of-lords-reform-bill/membership/ to http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/draft-house-of-lords-reform-bill/membership/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426063730/http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/draft-house-of-lords-reform-bill/news/publication-of-report/ to http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/draft-house-of-lords-reform-bill/news/publication-of-report/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.houseoflordsreform.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FinalPrint19042012-3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Removal of the "stopping scrutiny" sentence

I removed a false sentence in the Progress through Parliament section. Nick Clegg invoking the Parliament Act wouldn't have stopped scrutiny - the erstwhile Law Lords stated that the Act's validity was in question if a serious constitutional matter was involved. Indeed, Clegg's statement only provoked furious debate - many links in the article indicate that. Also to be noted is the fact that the sentence had been marked "dubious" for a quite a long time but had never been tended to. HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 08:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)