Talk:Hull Victoria Pier railway station

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Hull Victoria Pier railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name -no railway line[edit]

Can this "idiocy" be avoided where the place has to be named "railway station" because a railway company owned it. And the tying words in knots whilst the article has to explain that the thing doesn't have any railway lines. eg " It was not a railway station at all, just a ticket office ..." - this can be avoided.

I was an official destination on railway company timetables. That isn't a reason to start using a confusing title. It appears on timetables/tickets as "Hull Victoria Pier" etc not "Hull Victoria Pier railway station".

Is there a better title for this, Victoria Pier ferry terminal is one option?

Prof.Haddock (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please would you hold off moving railway station pages without discussing the moves first? We do have some established conventions, and it would be appreciated if these conventions were maintained. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]