Talk:Hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

This article is/was the subject of an Outreach Programs & Events Dashboard-supported course assignment.

Untitled

The article is well sturcered, very detailed and also good to read. The introduction might need some references and in the middle there are headlines without any explantations which might missing. --Andi Vogel (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology

You are doing a very nice work, i'd only like to suggest you to add more reference and write some other examples. Keep it up. My regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inuliago (talk • contribs) 09:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, the article is very detailed and the read is easy, the source are reliable! There is some not very important error like for example in the line "In conclusion..." in the biogeochemical part, and I suggest removing it because is not the end of a text. There are some issues about the copyright of image. The image of "Oil degrading microbial communities and ecological successions" is covered by copyright. About the images of degradation pathways (reference n°7) is not really cleary if the scheme are covered by copyright, be careful. --Microgigi (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Lost is my name (talk) 12:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Good job guys, it is an article full of information and it is also fairly clear but maybe the information could be written more directly, so that it goes straight to the point, but it is my personal point of view. The only criticism I have is that in scientific papers there should be no personal opinion, and they should be written impersonally, so without any 'if we consider'[reply]