Talk:IBM Lotus Symphony

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing / Software (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (marked as Mid-importance).
 

Symphony for iPhone[edit]

IBM announced in January 2008 that Symphony will be ported for iPhone. I see it's not in the article.--Lester 04:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

And not in the App Store either. --Aizuku (talk) 08:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Contradictory release dates?[edit]

Am I missing something, or does this article claim that this suite was first released in both 2007 and 2008? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeAvailableName (talkcontribs) 00:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

OpenOffice.org[edit]

Is IBM Lotus Symphony a fork of OpenOffice.org?173.58.64.64 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC).

It is based on code from OO.o 1.1.4 but has since then diverged from OO.o, so yes. --Aizuku (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Should the Availability of a 'Fix Pack' be mentioned under 'Versions' or otherwise.[edit]

IBM has released a bug fix Fix Pack for Version 3.0 of IBM Lotus Symphony [1]. I think this should be mentioned just after version '3.0' under the versions section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colablizzard (talkcontribs) 14:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Lotus Symphony Document 3.0B2.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Lotus Symphony Document 3.0B2.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Licensing Discussion[edit]

The text about the licensing links between Symphony and Openoffice.org does not seem quite right to me. When I read the H-Online article it talks about early versions of Symphony using the SISSL license, rather than "a special arrangement between IBM and Sun". Does anyone have citations that would help get this section of the text more accurate? ClareTheSharer (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)