Jump to content

Talk:IOPS/Archives/2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on IOPS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

M.2 NVMe Cards

The M.2 interface is new and offers performance comparable to PCIe for PCs, but there are no examples listed. It uses the new (small on-board) M.2 interface and connects thru either AHCI or the newer and faster NVMe. An example would be the 1TB Toshiba RD400 M.2 SSD, NVMe, 2600MB/s Read, 1550MB/s Write, although there are several relatively low-cost 256GB and 500GB devices on offer. Any reason why these devices using the M.2 interface are missing?  SurreyJohn   (Talk) 00:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

This article is incomplete

  • IOPS without latency is meaningless - now shown in the article; I don't have time to explain this. Some manufacturers abuse this selling you devices running at "TOP SPEED" with massive penalty in latency.
  • queue depth matters
  • Read IOPS/Write IOPS are different

Ushkin N (talk) 22:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

NPOV

This article begins with the paragraph:

> IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second, pronounced eye-ops) is a commonly misused and misunderstood performance measurement used to characterize computer storage devices like hard disk drives (HDD), solid state drives (SSD), and storage area networks (SAN). Frequently mischaracterized as a 'benchmark', IOPS numbers published by storage device manufacturers do not relate to real-world application performance.[1][2]

The content in this paragraph is fine. However, it is not an NPOV presentation of IOPS, and instead immediately comes out with a strong bias against how people measure IOPS. This paragraph should be rewritten with an objective definition of what IOPS is, and various ways of measuring it. The perspective that IOPS is "commonly misused and misunderstood" can then be integrated as a second paragraph contrasting normal presentations of IOPS against what is actually measured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.233.229.66 (talk) 18:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)