Talk:IPhone 16 Pro

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IPhone 16 Pro article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Apple Inc.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

iPhone 16 Pro Specifications are incorrect

iPhone 16 Pro is on the WiFi 7 standard, not WiFi 6E FriesMan19 (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been corrected, disregard. FriesMan19 (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

X71 modem

It seems that the iphones uses x71 instead of x75 https://www.techinsights.com/blog/apple-iphone-16-pro-max-a3295-teardown

SDX71M can be seen on the fourth image Adhame95 (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Community Discussion

I am soliciting feedback or second opinions on whether or not the infobox should contain technical details or if those details should be moved to the body of the article. Specifically CPU, GPU, and Modem. Inclusion or Exclusion with rationale is appreciated.

Inclusion I am in favor of inclusion based on consistency across infoboxes on both iPhone articles as well as most cell phones. Readers expect to see this information in a consistent location for quick reference without having to read through article prose. The article historically has this infobox information included. -Kai445 (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to fill every field. By the time someone has scrolled to the end of the current version of the infobox, they have already passed the relevant information in the body. This is not what infoboxes are for, and the current list of included fields is far beyond what is appropriate. It’s worth taking time to read MOS:INFOBOX, but to be simple, the infobox is a lead-level summary of the article, not a datasheet or spec sheet. Another simple rule: With some rare exceptions, everything in the infobox should already be discussed in the article body. — HTGS (talk) 01:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category

Why is this article not categorized under "Category:Flagship smartphones", while even the article about the lower-end iPhone 16 and 16 Plus is, which are arguably Apple's mid-range models? Maxeto0910 (talk) 18:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page (and the other Pro models) should certainly be added to Category:Flagship smartphones. As for whether the “mid-range” should be demoted, I’m less certain. That category looks a little light in general, so maybe just start by adding all the phones you believe should be considered flagship first, then we can consider removing next? That would, imo, be every iPhone except the SEs and 5C and XR (etc?), up till the Pro series, then every Pro model after they were introduced. — HTGS (talk) 03:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]