Talk:IPstream

Regarding the proposed merge

That merge notice has been there for 9 months, and this is the first comment about it.

Regarding the merge... bad idea. Yes, I realise it's really a BT/UK-specific issue, but... The BT article has far too much to cover, and cannot (or should not) include subjects such as IPStream in any depth, simply because it would become a horrendously oversized "catch all" article.

Certainly, it could mention IPStream; but I believe the main article should remain here.

If there is no further comment, I will remove the merge proposal in a few weeks time.

Fourohfour 23:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it where it is

I agree. It is useful as its own article in that it provides a definition for the term and some background on the product. Matt Graham 02:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge tag removed. Is the article title correct? Or should it be IP Stream? Kcordina ^Talk 12:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup and restructure

I've just done a pretty big cleanup, please feel free to improve it further and fix any mistakes that I have made. --Apyule 13:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phaseout

From what I can gather ipstream is in the process of being pretty aggressively phased out in favour of 21CN WBC service. Afaict it's already unavailable for new orders at most exchanges and will soon be discontinued completely at those exchanges (afaict it's still available at some rural exchages because 21CN isn't available at them yet). Plugwash (talk) 08:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]