Talk:IceRocket
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Notability
[edit]In my view the site is notable. it is the top 5000 Alexa sites [1], and is (probably - no source) the second biggest blog search engine, behind Technorati. Computerjoe's talk 16:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Also, Cnet wrote about it [2] as did Engadget [3] and Search Engine Journal [4]. Computerjoe's talk 16:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- I have added the notability tag back again. The article needs expansion to assert notability, not just here on the talk page. -- Barrylb 06:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've added more and removed the tag. Feel freee to reinsert it. Computerjoe's talk 14:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- I have added the notability tag back again. The article needs expansion to assert notability, not just here on the talk page. -- Barrylb 06:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This site is not notable at all! I would vote for delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barryblo (talk • contribs) 15:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Deleting sentence | "They are considered to have the best blog data of anyone in the world."
[edit]. . .
Google returns just three results for that quote. Delimited to "best blog data" and, variously, world, icerocket + both =
a handful of links at best.
Interestingly, there are only eight links in all for best blog data google | result
This suggests that not only is there no credibility to the unsourced claim, but that the general topic of "best blog data" is, at best, nascent.
Deleting. Avaiki (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
. . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaiki (talk • contribs) 08:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)