Talk:Ilona Tóth/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

An interesting and well-written article, suitably and fully cited.

The section structure is rudimentary, not unexpected in a short article. I suppose that Biography could be split into 'Early life', 'Hungarian Revolution', and 'Justice process' (or similar), which might be clearer. The 'Legacy' section has two chunks of text, the first without a subheading, the second with one, which is unbalanced. You might consider giving the first part a title such as 'Innocence or guilt'.
- Splitting up sections to only a few sentences generally isn't allowed in GAs, as compliance with MOS:LAYOUT is required. I've added the subheading under Legacy. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"She was a rare example of a woman who was recognized" => "She was one of the few women recognized".
- Fixed. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Semmelweis Medical School" seems to be Semmelweis University, which "is a research-led medical school in Budapest, Hungary, founded in 1769"; in which case, please wikilink. (I guess that means she studied there, which might make adding her to the list of notable folks over at that article a good idea ...)
- Linked. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The images, useful to the article, are from Commons and appear to be correctly licensed.

All spot-checks were successful.

Personally I'd format the References into columns; on Firefox at the moment there's just a single column regardless of the width of the window.

I nosed about for a template where Tóth might belong, but there isn't one specifically for the Hungarian Revolution which would be the obvious candidate. Maybe there's scope there, but nothing to do with the GA criteria.

Summary

This is a fascinating short article, basically fully ready for GA, once the few comments above have been addressed. Excellent work. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chiswick Chap Should meet all of the GA criteria now, I think. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.