This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This song is worthy of its own page; Its not just a song that many would recognise the characteristic sound of (no memory of what adverts it heheh), but consider that the content of this page is information specific to the song and quite adequetely mentioned in direct reference to it.
There are references that could be taken from and put etc, but merge isn't the answer.
(LedTony)
So shouldnt we take down the sing on the page suggesting merge, because obviously that is a horrible idea seeing as less important songs with far less descriptive pages exist on there own.Tubyboulin 02:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If someone works on the article and improves it, that would strengthen their case to stop a merge. LuciferMorgan 15:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox is wrong for a start. LuciferMorgan 15:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 01:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
