Talk:Inertialess drive
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Article for deletion
[edit]An anonymous user has nominated this page for deletion, giving as justification only a few claims about physics added after I created the page. This seems insufficient to me.
—FlashSheridan 17:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Isn't an intertialess drive the same thing as a reactionless drive? Keraunos (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
In fiction
[edit]The 'in fiction' section seems to suffer from being written 'in universe'. RJFJR (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
merge
[edit]I suggest merging Bergenholm space drive into the more general inertialess drive article. --DavidCary (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Redirected, rather than merged, as there is no referenced material present. Klbrain (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)