Talk:Intensional logic
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What intensional logic is
[edit]Intensional logic is not a family of non-truth-functional logics. It is logic that treats both sense and reference of expressions. The whole article, while nicely enough written, goes off at the wrong tangent. Some can be salvaged, but the surgery will be savage. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I beg to differ! The article is not nicely written. A lot of it seems to be written by someone with a poor command of English. 86.155.1.106 (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Poor English
[edit]This:
- The semantical motivations were explained expressively, of course without those tools that we know in establishing semantics for modal logic in a formal way...
needs to be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.217.237 (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- Start-Class Theoretical Linguistics articles
- Theoretical Linguistics Task Force articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class logic articles
- Mid-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Start-Class Analytic philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Analytic philosophy articles
- Analytic philosophy task force articles