Talk:International Christian School (Hong Kong)
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Christian School (Hong Kong) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Schools||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Hong Kong||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
This page sucks. You kids obviously don't know what you're dealing with, just scrap the page like it was scrapped how many years ago... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lameoh (talk • contribs) 04:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Uh.... The person who edited this.... Is it enough now? --Florence Lau 06:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Add more about when ICS started, not just the NSB. (New school building in Shek Mun for those who don't know.) I'll try to fix the grammar a bit and perhaps add more. I'll try to add something on the curriculum as that's virtually nonexistent. The NSB part need a lot of editing. --Soon to be Ninth Grader VltavaMusicFanatic (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've add some more info. Is there someone in Grade 6 or so who could give more info on Elementary, since it's changed from when I was there, so I can't do so much. VltavaMusicFanatic (talk) 06:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Someone needs to put something in on the new debenture policy. You know, the depreciating one? I can't seem to find the right sources.
Criticism and Controversy
This section does not seem very nPOV, and contains weasel words. Also the document it links to is not available. It should be rewritten to provide some real content. Muchado (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Repeated IP vandalism
This article was protected back on 25 October following repeated attempts by editor(s) from at least five different IP addresses to add considerable identical, unsourced content containing a lot of peacockish and weaselish material. I wrote on the user talk pages of several of those IPs, to no avail. Following unprotection yesterday the material was immediately re-added, from yet another IP address. There has now even been a little extra material of the same kind added.
- I reverted the unacceptable content. It was reverted back 4 hours later by the same IP editor, with the insulting edit summary of "Undid revision because of consistent vandalism by HiLo48.See explanation before! Info are from exclusive interviews, school internal publications, etc." This IP hopping editor is clearly incompetent (or being deliberately disruptive). If I don't see a helpful response here by tonight I will seek protection again. (Anyone else is welcome to follow that path too.) HiLo48 (talk) 19:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)