Talk:Islamic University of Madinah

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

article needs major work[edit]

There are no references and it reads like brochure from the University. I am going to start by inlcuding a quotation from a UK journalist. Its only an attempt to get some editing going but it is a very early attempt to introduce some neutrality in the article by including some criticism.

Sgmiller 11:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC) sgmiller

I agree, it could use a lot. As for it being written like a brochure, look no further than myself. I will admit that it's style is rather informal, though in my defense this is the first article on an academic institution I have worked on. It was a stub before so it is a little more substantial now. As for criticism, I think what you posted is very relevant; however, I think it would fit better in it's own section rather than the introductory paragraph. While criticism of public notability is essential to any article and should be recorded, putting it at the beginning could swing things in the other direction rather than pulling the article back to the center (more neutral, I mean). Let me know what you think. MezzoMezzo 23:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fix[edit]

Fix the No Ref error please someone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TrainTC (talk • contribs) 16:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

multiple issues[edit]

I'm adding a multiple issues tag, and replacing the current tag for citations, which is the incorrect one for the state of this article. Below is a summary of the issues.

1. Advertisement/peacock: This article essentially reads like a brochure for this school, and as such is non-encyclopedic. The biggest example is the sentence "The university is culturally diverse and boasts almost all nationalities from across the globe. What makes the university so attractive towards the students accros [sic] the globe is..." It concludes with links for admissions (more on this below).

2. References/citations/original research: There are absolutely no references, and it doesn't appear that there ever have been. There are three external links which all lead to websites run by the school, and thus there are no independent sources. The link to the main website is a good one to have, but the page is in Arabic. Is there an English version of it? As the article is in English, so too should be external links. The other two links are for application forms, which contributes to the advertisement/pamphlet style mentioned above. Links to apply do not belong on an encyclopedic article, and presumably anyone wishing to apply should be able to find their way through the main website to do so. I am removing these two.

We can all assume good faith, especially because this appears to be a response to everyone on the talk page looking to apply (which accounts for the majority of the talk page, and is not at all what the talk page is for).

3. Neutrality/balance/worldwide view/repetition: There are no sections for criticism or controversy. This is important to present a non-biased, objective article. The very study programs themselves (Sharia, Qur'an, Hadith, etc.) are controversial in many places in the world, which at the very least should be mentioned. The only study programs listed, with the exception of the Arabic language, deal exclusively with the study of Islam. As such, the wider academic community may very well not see this as a true "university" if it does not contain subjects such as math, science; or history and literature not related to Islam; etc.

There are also phrases such as "international students from all over the world" and "culturally diverse and boasts almost all nationalities from across the globe" and "attractive towards the students accros the globe." These three phrases are all contained within the three sentences of the History section, which is significantly repetitive. Furthermore, they appear to be misleading regarding the diversity of the school. As non-Muslims are not allowed in Medina, then logically every student at this school is Muslim. I'm also not sure if that qualifies it as "public" though I could be wrong.

Again, I certainly assume good faith, and these tags should not be seen as a badge of shame. The subject obviously qualifies as notable and therefore should not be considered for deletion, but this article needs significant improvement to be brought up to wikipedia standards. Klopek007 (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

waxan raba in aan galo jamacada si aan u barto diinta islamka sidee ku helikara jamacada madiina almunawara — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.220.64.64 (talk) 14:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

apply in this university[edit]

i would like applying in this university but i dont know wath to doCite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).</ref> aoa; here should be added a page which gives information about Isalmic studies department — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.39.188.215 (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Licence en science informatique Idrissa abdoul moumouni (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Islamic University of Madinah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615025631/http://saudiembassy.net/files/PDF/Publications/Magazine/2000-Winter/Madinah.htm to http://www.saudiembassy.net/files/PDF/Publications/Magazine/2000-Winter/Madinah.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]