Talk:Italian battleship Duilio/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 10:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA[edit]

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • Include a link to Occupation of Smyrna in the 1919 section.
  • The 1925 magazine explosion sounds like a big deal - was anyone killed? Was there an investigation into the cause?
  • You could clarify a little who Enrico Tellini was - as written he could be anybody. Perhaps "the murder of General Enrico Tellini and four others conducting a survey of the Greek-Albanian border for the League of Nations" provides more context.
  • There is no introduction to the Second World War - the article goes from peace to "Caio Duilio's first wartime patrol" without explanation. Perhaps "Following the Italian entry into World War II in June 1940, Caio Duilio's first wartime patrol . . ."
  • Give a date for the British attack on Genoa.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.

Thanks for reviewing the article, Jackyd, I'll work on your suggestions! Parsecboy (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]