Talk:Italian cruiser Nino Bixio

Italian cruiser Nino Bixio has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Italian cruiser Nino Bixio is part of the Protected cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 4, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
February 13, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Nino Bixio/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	suggest a note to explain calibre (ie L/50) Added - you'd think after doing enough of these I'd remember to do them ahead of time ;) suggest a display title template be used to italicise the ship name in the article title Fixed suggest the namesake be added, Nino Bixio a protege of Garibaldi Good idea
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	destroyer is overlinked Fixed not sure why the power output isn't in the infobox, just for consistency with other ship articles, really Apparently I forgot to include it suggest linking Albania during World War I rather than just Albania Hmm, that seems a little WP:EGGy given the context Not a biggie, I kind of get your point. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	ok
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	ok
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	ok
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No images
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No images
	7. Overall assessment.	~~Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed~~ Passing, well done.

Ref to use

Here on the action in December. Parsecboy (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trials info. Parsecboy (talk) 10:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photo (of low quality) here. Parsecboy (talk) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]