Jump to content

Talk:Italian cruiser Trieste

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Trieste/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 22:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Suggest implementing the tweaks done to Trento, as most of them apply here. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got them all, let me know if there's anything else to address. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a matter of consistency regarding Triest/Trieste in the text and infobox, Triest was the German spelling I believe.
    • Good catch
  • I made a couple of minor grammar tweaks, check to make sure I haven't changed something important.
    • Everything looks fine to me
  • suggest using the abbreviation shp in infobox for clarity
    • Fixed
  • suggest linking bulkhead (partition)
    • Done
  • suggest linking Anti-aircraft warfare
    • Done
  • suggest linking Ship commissioning in body
    • Done
  • worth mentioning that Operation Hats was a convoy to Malta from Alexandria which was escorted by the RN Med Fleet, particularly as it then says "another" convoy to Malta, move Malta link up to first mention
    • Good idea
  • USAAF should probably be in full
    • Done
  • Add the OCLC (50182392) for Mattesini
    • I had meant to do that but got distracted, apparently.
  • I think it is more than reasonable to assume that File:Italian cruiser Trieste NH 86003.jpg and File:Italian cruiser Trieste NH 86004.jpg were taken by a USN employee as they are marked as ONI images.
    • You're probably right.

This article is in fine shape, that's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review, Peacemaker! Parsecboy (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This article is well written, verifiable using reliable sources, with no original research, copyright violations or plagiarism, covers the topic well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by properly licensing images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]