This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
There is a description in the text of the original Stereophile being a pamphlet-sized, typewritten magazine, or something of that sort. I am reasonably certain that the original magazine was in a larger format, 8 1/2 X 11 I think, typeset as well, in black and white with a cover of red, black and white. (I have copies around here someplace, but as one might guess, I can't find them at the moment.) The move to a pamphlet-sized, typewritten format was perhaps some years later and done, I believe, as a cost-saving change. If I ever find my copies, I can provide some more detail. I remember going out at lunchtime in Washington, DC in 1969 and 1970, buying up older copies of the magazine, as it was one of my favorites. At one time I had a prospectus, probably from 1962, advertising the publication. Being rather young at the time, I didn't subscribe immediately; even then, the cost of the equipment JGH was reviewing was beyond my means, though I did subscribe a few years later, about the time I started looking for back issues in DC. Stereophile published bound collections of the first couple of years, in the larger format, that I bought and have buried here as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinrossus (talk • contribs) 14:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
