Talk:James L. Leighton
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]When this is inevitably put up for Speedy Delete, I would like to note that, if all of the unreferenced statements about awards etc. are correct, Dr. Leighton does not seem to be a patently non-notable person. Riffraffselbow (talk) 23:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
"does not seem to be a patently non-notable person" ... does that mean he seems to be a patently notable person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.111.194.91 (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Correct. I was stating my opinion that this article should not be speedy-deleted. Seems to be out of the woods on that, but if you look back at the first revision, it looked a lot more iffy. And yeah, that double-negative was a bit wierd. Riffraffselbow (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)