Talk:James T. Butts Jr./GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 00:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Infobox
- The URL used for FN1 (California Birth Index) doesn't say anything on Butts
- Done CorporateM (Talk) 14:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Lead
- If the article's subject is known as "James T. Butts, Jr.", why is there nothing for "T" or even the initial itself in the opening sentence?
- While citations are generally not needed in the lead section per WP:LEADCITE, I will say that FN2 (City of Inglewood) also doesn't support his birth date
- I don't see where citation 2 is used to verify his birthdate. It's used in the Lede to verify his education. CorporateM (Talk) 14:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Law enforcements career
- "He held that position until 2006"..... try served as chief
- "in that position" from "Early in his tenure in that position" isn't really needed
- "since those arrested wouldn't be prosecuted"..... avoid contractions unless part of a quote or title
- "he said the city's infrastructure and economy had decayed"..... not sure if "decayed" is the best word choice
- How about "deteriorated"? CorporateM (Talk) 14:07, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Mayor
- Add a comma after "According to the Los Angeles Business Journal"
- I'm skeptical about the tone of "For example" (which is used twice)
- "Butts worked Lakers games"..... something's not right here- one can't "work" a game
- References
- "The Los Angeles Sentinel" and "LA Sentinel" should read Los Angeles Sentinel
- "Seattle Times" should read The Seattle Times
- Is "Sports on Earth" a reliable source?
- Not sure. It looks like a pretty in-depth professional piece, but I can't find more information on the author. CorporateM (Talk) 14:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- The link to "Los Angeles Wave" is dead, and I'm not sure it's a reliable source
- According to their about page, it's a 100 year-old local newspaper with 1.8 million readers and the largest local weekly in the area. Seems like exactly the type of local source you'd expect for a local politician. CorporateM (Talk) 14:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- "LA Times" should read Los Angeles Times
- FN5 is missing its work parameter, Santa Monica Daily Press
- FN's 7, 9, 17, and 19 need to have accessdates
- Overall
- Well-written?: Decent, but could be better
- Verifiable?: Not entirely
- Broad in Coverage?: There is nothing on the subject's early life, his family, or how he became interested in pursuing his careers.
- Neutral?: Looks good
- Stable?: Nothing of concern
- Illustrated, if possible, by images?: The one image used is relevant, appropriately licensed, and has a suitable caption
- Pass or Fail?: The article is not complete and needs considerable expansion, so I am failing this. Do more research before renominating.